Hurricane Melissa — now one of the strongest storms ever recorded in the Caribbean — has become a Category 5 hurricane with sustained winds exceeding 160 mph. As of the morning of 28 October 2025, the storm was located roughly 120 miles south of Kingston, Jamaica, and is projected to make landfall later that day or early Tuesday, 29 October 2025.
Melissa underwent extreme rapid intensification over the weekend, doubling its strength in less than 24 hours — a phenomenon attributed to unusually warm ocean temperatures across the Caribbean Sea. Meteorologists have noted that satellite data captured winds peaking as high as 190 mph in the storm’s core, rivaling Hurricane Dorian from 2019 in terms of intensity. The following article provides an overview of the projected path and damage of the storm, as well as implications to the larger insurance/reinsurance marketplace, and the role that captive insurance strategies often play in helping to insulate, manage, and mitigate the impact of international catastrophe events.
Executive Summary
As of the morning of October 28, 2025, Hurricane Melissa has achieved Category 5 intensity with maximum sustained winds of 175 mph and a minimum central pressure of 901 millibars—ranking it among the most powerful Atlantic hurricanes ever recorded. The storm is currently positioned approximately 115 miles south-southwest of Kingston, Jamaica, advancing north-northeast at a deliberate pace of just 5 mph.
Melissa's forecast path takes it directly across Jamaica on October 28, with landfall expected along the southern coast near midday. The hurricane will then track across southeastern Cuba during the early morning hours of October 29, before moving through the southeastern or central Bahamas later that same day. By late October 31 or early November 1, the system is forecast to pass near Bermuda before transitioning to a post-tropical cyclone over the North Atlantic.
Anticipated Strength at Landfall:
Meteorologists anticipate Melissa will make landfall in Jamaica as an "upper-end" Category 4 or solid Category 5 hurricane with sustained winds between 155-175 mph. This would make it the strongest hurricane to directly strike Jamaica since record-keeping began in 1851, surpassing the benchmark set by Hurricane Gilbert in 1988, which made landfall as a Category 4 storm with 130 mph winds. Even after interacting with Jamaica's mountainous terrain, Melissa is expected to remain a major hurricane (Category 3 or higher) as it impacts eastern Cuba and the Bahamas.
Catastrophic Multi-Hazard Threat:
The National Hurricane Center has issued grave warnings about the storm's life-threatening impacts. Beyond the destructive wind field—which extends 30 miles from the core with hurricane-force winds and 195 miles with tropical storm-force winds—Melissa poses an extraordinary rainfall and storm surge threat. Rainfall totals of 15-30 inches are forecast across Jamaica and southern Hispaniola, with isolated areas potentially receiving up to 40 inches. This deluge will trigger catastrophic flash flooding and numerous landslides, particularly across mountainous terrain.
Along Jamaica's southern coast, life-threatening storm surge of 9-13 feet above ground level is anticipated, accompanied by large destructive waves. Eastern Cuba faces a dangerous surge of 7-11 feet, while the southeastern Bahamas and Turks and Caicos could experience 4-6 feet of inundation. The combination of extreme winds, unprecedented rainfall, and major storm surge creates what the National Hurricane Center describes as conditions where "total structural failure is probable" near the storm's center, leading to "widespread infrastructural damage, prolonged power and communication outages, and isolated communities".
Industry catastrophe modeling firms have begun quantifying Hurricane Melissa's potential insured losses, with early estimates suggesting significant impact to the global reinsurance market. Cotality, a leading catastrophe risk modeling firm, estimates insurable losses from Hurricane Melissa will range between $5 billion and $10 billion. This estimate encompasses wind and storm surge damage to residential, commercial, and industrial properties across Jamaica, Cuba, and the Bahamas, along with business interruption exposures.
To contextualize this figure, Jamaica's nominal GDP stands at approximately $19.9 billion. A direct Category 5 landfall impacting the island's most populous corridor could result in insured losses representing a substantial portion of the nation's economic output, with the potential to strain public finances for years. The concentration of exposure—combined with record-setting landfall intensity and Melissa's slow forward movement, which prolongs destructive impacts—creates conditions for losses that could represent "one of the most concentrated reinsurance events ever seen in the Caribbean".
The $5-10 billion loss estimate positions Hurricane Melissa as a significant industry event, though notably below the threshold of truly market-transforming catastrophes. For comparison, the estimate falls between Hurricane Beryl's 2024 Caribbean/Mexico impact ($400-700 million insured losses in Jamaica and Cayman Islands alone) and Hurricane Dorian's 2019 Bahamas devastation ($4-8.5 billion in total insured losses). However, the geographic concentration and the potential for loss development—as claims emerge from business interruption, supply chain disruption, and infrastructure damage—suggest the ultimate insured loss figure could trend toward or exceed the upper end of current projections.
Parametric Trigger Activation:
Jamaica has prudently structured a sophisticated disaster risk financing tower that includes a $150 million IBRD CAR Jamaica 2024 parametric catastrophe bond issued through the World Bank. This instrument utilizes parametric triggers based on storm intensity and geographic boxes—meaning payouts are determined by objective meteorological measurements rather than actual damage assessments, enabling rapid liquidity post-event.
Given Melissa's forecast intensity (central pressure of 901 mb, well below most parametric thresholds of 920-960 mb depending on geographic zone) and its track through multiple trigger boxes, there remains a "strong possibility that Jamaica's cat bond coverage is activated". The parametric insurance layers below the cat bond are likely already triggered, providing the government with rapid-response capital for emergency relief and initial recovery operations. This represents a textbook example of how sophisticated risk transfer mechanisms can provide immediate post-disaster liquidity—a critical capability that captive insurance structures can similarly deliver for corporate insureds.
To understand Hurricane Melissa's potential market impact, it's important to examine how comparable events have affected the insurance and reinsurance landscape in recent years.
Hurricane Beryl (July 2024):
Just over a year ago, Hurricane Beryl carved a destructive path through the Caribbean as the earliest Category 5 Atlantic hurricane on record. While Beryl's intensity was comparable to Melissa, its track kept the strongest winds south of Jamaica's most densely populated areas—specifically avoiding Kingston—which significantly limited insured losses.
Total insured losses from Beryl were estimated at:
Despite Beryl's lower overall loss total, the storm demonstrated the vulnerability of Caribbean infrastructure and the concentration risk facing insurers and reinsurers with exposure to the region. Industry experts noted that had Beryl's track shifted just slightly northward, bringing the eyewall's strongest winds across Kingston and Jamaica's most developed areas, losses would have been substantially higher—precisely the scenario now unfolding with Hurricane Melissa.
Hurricane Dorian (Semptember 2019)
Hurricane Dorian provides perhaps the most relevant comparison for understanding Melissa's potential impact on the Bahamas. Dorian made landfall as a Category 5 hurricane with 185 mph sustained winds—the strongest Atlantic landfall on record—and then stalled over the Abaco Islands and Grand Bahama for nearly 30 hours, producing unprecedented destruction.
Total and insured losses from Dorian included:
Dorian's slow movement and extreme intensity caused "total structural failure" across wide areas of Abaco, with most residential and commercial buildings suffering complete destruction. The storm's behavior—maintaining Category 5 intensity for nearly 30 hours while battering the same islands—created loss amplification that exceeded initial catastrophe model projections. This "loss creep" phenomenon, where ultimate claims settle at higher levels than early estimates, became a significant concern for reinsurers and contributed to subsequent market hardening.
The Caribbean insurance market had never experienced anything like Dorian's concentrated devastation. With return periods estimated in the "four-digit or possibly five-digit" range for such an extreme stalling Category 5 event, the storm challenged traditional actuarial assumptions and highlighted the limitations of historical loss data in an era of changing hurricane behavior.
The 2017 Atlantic hurricane season stands as the benchmark for understanding how multiple major catastrophic events within a single season can fundamentally reshape insurance markets. Three hurricanes—Harvey, Irma, and Maria—struck in rapid succession during August and September, delivering a cumulative blow that tested the global reinsurance industry's capacity and capital.
Combined insured losses from the 2017 hurricane trio totaled approximately $80 billion, with individual storm estimates of:
Including other 2017 natural catastrophes such as severe earthquakes in Mexico and California wildfires, the year's total insured losses reached $135 billion—the highest insured loss year ever recorded, surpassing even the 2011 Tohoku earthquake year. Overall economic losses, including uninsured damages, totaled $330 billion.
The 2017 hurricane season provides the clearest template for understanding how Hurricane Melissa—should losses approach the $5-10 billion range—could impact global property and casualty insurance markets.
Capital Depletion and Reinsurer Stress
The immediate effect of major catastrophic losses is the depletion of reinsurer capital. Following the 2017 hurricanes, global reinsurers reported losses representing 7-14% of their total capital base. While the industry remained solvent and operational—a testament to pre-event capitalization—the magnitude of claims absorbed the sector's net income for the entire year.
Critically, the 2017 events marked the first significant test of the alternative capital market that had grown to supply approximately $90 billion in capacity by 2017 (up from just $10 billion in 2005). Catastrophe bonds, collateralized reinsurance, and insurance-linked securities (ILS) vehicles sustained substantial losses. Significant amounts of collateral in affected contracts were either paid out or "trapped" (held in reserve pending ultimate loss settlements), rendering this capital unavailable for subsequent renewal seasons. This dynamic—where capital becomes stranded even before final claims are paid—creates immediate capacity constraints that ripple through the market.
The Market Hardens: Rate Increases and Terms Tighten
Following 2017's losses, the reinsurance market entered a period of significant hardening that persisted through 2023. While initial 2018 renewal increases were relatively modest—in the 5-7% range for broad portfolios—rates continued climbing as loss development exceeded initial estimates.
By the January 2023 renewal season, the cumulative effect of 2017-2022 catastrophe losses (including Hurricane Ian, California wildfires, and European floods) drove risk-adjusted global property catastrophe reinsurance rates on line (RoLs) up by an average of 37%—the largest single-year increase since Hurricane Andrew in 1992. Peak-exposed programs in catastrophe-prone regions saw even steeper increases, with some U.S. Gulf Coast and Florida programs experiencing rate rises of 50-100% or more.
Beyond pricing, reinsurers imposed significantly more restrictive terms and conditions:
Capacity Restrictions
Perhaps more concerning than price increases is the outright withdrawal of capacity from certain segments. Following major loss years, reinsurers typically reduce their exposure to peak catastrophe zones, creating genuine availability issues for cedants seeking coverage.
In the post-2017 market, several dynamics emerged:
The result was a market where price became almost secondary to the fundamental question of whether coverage could be obtained at all. Insurers found themselves needing to retain significantly more risk, purchase coverage from less-preferred partners, or leave exposures unprotected.
Should Hurricane Melissa generate insured losses in the projected $5-10 billion range, the global property catastrophe reinsurance market will face its most significant test since Hurricane Ian in 2022. While this loss magnitude alone may not trigger the dramatic market dislocation seen after 2017 (when losses were 8-16 times higher), several factors suggest meaningful market impact:
Timing and Market Positioning
The reinsurance market enters Melissa in a position of relative strength. After highly profitable years in 2023-2024—with average reinsurer returns on equity projected at 17.3%—and with total dedicated reinsurance capital increasing 6.9% to $607 billion, the sector has substantial capacity to absorb losses. Recent renewals have seen rate reductions of 5-15% for non-loss-impacted programs as reinsurer appetite has exceeded demand.
However, this favorable positioning could shift rapidly if Melissa produces losses at the upper end of projections. The concentration of exposure in the Caribbean—where per-occurrence limits for many reinsurers are relatively high given the limited number of major risk accumulations—means that a $7-10 billion event could penetrate deeper into reinsurance programs than its absolute dollar value might suggest.
Regional Rate Impact: Carribean and Catasrophe-Exposed Programs
Insurers and reinsurance buyers with direct exposure to Jamaica, Cuba, and the Bahamas should anticipate significant renewal challenges in 2026.
Loss-impacted programs will likely face:
Risk-adjusted rate increases of 15-30% at January 1, 2026 renewals, consistent with post-loss renewal patterns
Reduced participation from existing reinsurers, particularly for lower-layer coverage
Requirements for higher retentions before reinsurance attaches
More restrictive aggregate loss limits and reinstatement provisions
Regional spillover effects will extend beyond directly impacted carriers:
Other Caribbean and Central American programs, even without losses, may face rate increases of 5-15% as reinsurers reassess regional exposure
U.S. Gulf Coast and Florida programs could see marginal rate pressure (2-5% increases) as reinsurers balance portfolio exposure
Peak-zone property catastrophe programs globally may experience slight hardening as overall reinsurance capital deployment becomes more selective
Capacity Implications: Selective Retrenchment
While overall reinsurance capacity remains robust, Melissa could accelerate a trend toward more selective deployment:
Alternative capital caution: ILS funds and cat bond investors, having absorbed losses from recent events, may reduce exposure to Caribbean perils or demand higher returns
Working layer constraints: The layers of reinsurance programs most likely to be affected by Melissa—the "working layers" that respond to medium-sized events—have already experienced rate pressure from Hurricane Ian and other recent events. Another loss could make these layers more expensive and harder to fill
Aggregate protection: Reinsurers may be more reluctant to provide aggregate coverage (protection against multiple events in a single year) for Caribbean-exposed programs, given the potential for clustering of storms
The most misunderstood aspect of major catastrophe losses is how they affect insureds thousands of miles from the impact zone. Hurricane Melissa's market impact will extend far beyond Jamaica, Cuba, and the Bahamas through several mechanisms:
Reinsurance Cost Pass-Through
Primary insurers purchase reinsurance to protect their own balance sheets. When reinsurance becomes more expensive following a major loss, these costs are inevitably passed through to underlying insureds in the form of higher primary insurance premiums. A property owner in California or a manufacturer in Germany may see insurance costs rise 5-10% following Caribbean hurricane losses, even though their exposure had no connection to the event.
Capacity-Driven Market Hardening
When reinsurance capacity contracts, primary insurers have several options—all of which negatively impact insureds:
Following the 2017 hurricanes and subsequent loss years, commercial insurance markets saw these dynamics play out through 2019-2022, with property rates increasing 15-30% annually for several consecutive years even in non-catastrophe-exposed regions.
Supply Chain and Business Interruption Impacts
Major catastrophic events disrupt global supply chains, creating business interruption and contingent business interruption losses far from the disaster zone. Jamaica, Cuba, and the Bahamas are integrated into international commerce through:
Companies dependent on these supply chains may face weeks or months of disruption, generating insurance claims under contingent business interruption coverage. These claims add to the overall industry loss burden and can create unexpected exposure for insurers who thought they had minimal catastrophe risk.
Collateral Calls and Financial Market Stress
Insurers and reinsurers facing large loss payments often need to liquidate investments to fund claims. Following major catastrophes, this can create:
These financial market effects are typically modest for events below $20-30 billion in insured losses but can create ripples in specialized segments of capital markets.
The cascading effects of major catastrophic events—rate increases, capacity restrictions, terms tightening, and supply chain disruption—create compelling value propositions for sophisticated risk managers to consider captive insurance structures. Rather than being passive recipients of market volatility, companies with captive insurance arrangements can strategically position themselves to weather storm-driven market dislocations.
Insulation from Reinsurance Market Hardening
Traditional insurance programs lock cedants into the market cycle. When rates rise following a catastrophe, insureds have limited options beyond accepting higher premiums or reducing coverage. Captive insurance structures break this cycle by allowing companies to:
Capacity Assurance: Coverage When Others Can't Find It
The most critical failure mode in insurance isn't high prices—it's unavailability. Following major catastrophes, certain classes of coverage simply disappear from the market as insurers withdraw from segments they deem unacceptably risky. Recent examples include:
Captives provide capacity assurance by:
Controlling the Coverage Response: Business Interruption and Extra Expense
Hurricane Melissa will generate substantial business interruption claims far beyond the Caribbean impact zone. Companies dependent on suppliers, customers, or distribution channels in affected regions will face operational disruptions lasting weeks or months. Traditional contingent business interruption (CBI) coverage is notoriously difficult to trigger, with strict requirements for:
Captive insurance structures allow companies to craft CBI and supply chain coverage that actually responds to real-world disruptions:
Managing Uninsurable Risks: Regulatory Changes, Reputation, and Force Majeure
Major catastrophes create second- and third-order risks that don't fit traditional insurance categories:
Regulatory disruption: Post-disaster regulatory changes, emergency orders, and modified building codes can create unexpected compliance costs and operational restrictions. A captive can provide coverage for these risks.
Reputational and ESG implications: Companies perceived as benefiting from disaster (through price gouging, delayed response to humanitarian needs, or inadequate support for affected communities) face reputational damage that traditional insurance doesn't address. Captive structures can incorporate ESG-linked triggers and crisis management coverage.
Force majeure and contract penalties: When disasters prevent performance under commercial contracts, companies may face penalties, liquidated damages, or contract termination. Captives can provide coverage for these commercial risks that fall between traditional insurance categories.
Cost Efficiency and Capital Management
Beyond direct insurance benefits, captives provide financial advantages that become particularly valuable during market hard cycles:
Hurricane Melissa stands as the latest reminder that catastrophic risk—whether directly experienced or felt through market disruption—is an inescapable reality of operating in an interconnected global economy. The traditional approach to managing this risk through purchased insurance leaves companies vulnerable not just to disasters, but to the market volatility those disasters create.
The historical pattern is clear: major catastrophic events like the 2017 hurricane season produce market dislocations that last years, driving insurance costs up by 30-50% or more and restricting capacity for both directly affected and tangentially exposed insureds. These "ancillary impacts"—the rate increases, coverage restrictions, and supply chain disruptions affecting companies thousands of miles from the disaster zone—often represent larger aggregate costs than the direct insured losses themselves.
Captive insurance structures transform this dynamic from a threat into an opportunity. Rather than passively accepting whatever pricing, terms, and capacity the market offers, companies with captives take control of their own insurance destiny. They retain risks they can afford, access reinsurance markets on favorable terms, maintain pricing stability across market cycles, and ensure coverage remains available when they need it most.
As Hurricane Melissa's impacts unfold over the coming weeks—and as those impacts ripple through reinsurance renewals and into primary market pricing over the coming quarters—the distinction between companies that own their risk management infrastructure and those that merely purchase it will become increasingly apparent.
For organizations with substantial property exposures, complex supply chains, or operations in catastrophe-prone regions, the question isn't whether a captive insurance structure would add value—it's whether they can afford to remain dependent on an external insurance market that grows more expensive and less reliable with each major catastrophic event.
Take Action: Partner with Captives.Insure
The window to protect your client's from the cascading market impacts of Hurricane Melissa and future catastrophic events is narrowing. As the reinsurance market digests this loss and adjusts pricing for 2026 renewals, companies without alternative risk transfer strategies will face difficult choices: pay significantly higher premiums, accept reduced coverage, or retain risks they're unprepared to manage.
Captives Insure specializes in helping sophisticated brokers and captive managers navigate these exact situations. As one of the largest independent captive insurance program managers in the world, we provide the expertise, infrastructure, and AM Best rated capacity to help you transform traditional insurance from a sunk cost into a strategic asset.
Whether you're exploring captive insurance for the first time or seeking to optimize an existing structure, our team has the tools and experience to deliver solutions tailored to your specific risk profile and strategic objectives.
SUBMIT A RISK