A captive is not difficult to form, but it is easy to form badly. The value of the vehicle is decided long before the first policy is issued — in the discipline of the questions asked at the outset. Done well, it lets an organization retain the underwriting profit and investment income that would otherwise flow to a commercial carrier, gain control over its cost of risk, and access coverage the traditional market prices poorly. Done carelessly, it becomes an under-capitalized entity holding volatility it was never equipped to absorb. The difference is decided during formation — which is why the process requires disciplined underwriting and evaluation.
A captive is simply a privately owned, licensed and regulated insurance company. These regulated entities can seem complex to those evaluating for the this time. However, coordinating the right team of specialists and an independent advisor is of utmost importance to provide the appropriate structure for the captive owner, eliminate confusion and manage expectations. Understanding each individuals role and where the questions should be directed simplifies this process for the captive owner and broker.
One of the quieter measures of a healthy captive is that, over time, it gives money back. Premiums retained on favorable lines, underwriting profit on layers that stay claim-free, and investment income earned on reserves all accumulate inside the captive. At some point the question stops being how the captive builds capital and becomes what it should do with the capital it has built. Returning value to the parent — through dividends or other distributions — is one of the most tangible benefits of owning a captive, and also one of the easiest to get wrong.
Very few captives are formed to do everything at once. Most begin with a single, well-understood problem: a deductible layer the parent is already effectively retaining, a coverage the commercial market has priced punitively, or a contractual requirement that a conventional placement satisfies only at a cost that no longer makes sense. The captive is stood up to solve that one problem, and in the early years its purpose is narrow by design
Few exposures test a construction insurance program the way New York does. A worker who is already covered by workers' compensation can, through a chain of contractual and statutory mechanics, end up generating a multi-million-dollar liability claim that lands squarely on the general liability tower — and, in turn, on whoever agreed to indemnify up the contractual chain. That mechanism is commonly called "action over," and in New York it operates against the backdrop of the most plaintiff-favorable construction liability statute in the country. For any captive owner with New York project exposure, or with contracts that reach into New York work, understanding how these two forces combine is essential before deciding what to retain and what to cede
Every business carries risk, but not all risk is equal; and not all of it can be handed to the standard commercial market. Some exposures are covered cleanly by conventional property, liability, and workers' compensation policies. Others are priced punitively, covered only narrowly, or effectively uninsurable in the traditional market altogether. The first purpose of an enterprise risk assessment is to understand an organization's risk in full: to see plainly what threatens the business and, just as importantly, which of those threats the standard market does not adequately address
Capital is what separates a captive that looks like an insurer from one that functions as one. When a captive applies for a license, the regulator's central question is not whether the structure is clever or the tax treatment favorable, it is whether the company holds enough capital and surplus to pay the claims it promises to pay, under adverse conditions as well as expected ones. Capitalization is therefore not a one-time formality of formation. It is the ongoing measure of whether a captive can actually bear the risk it has taken on
SUBMIT A RISK