Very few captives are formed to do everything at once. Most begin with a single, well-understood problem: a deductible layer the parent is already effectively retaining, a coverage the commercial market has priced punitively, or a contractual requirement that a conventional placement satisfies only at a cost that no longer makes sense. The captive is stood up to solve that one problem, and in the early years its purpose is narrow by design
For a multi-state staffing company, workers' compensation was the single largest line on its insurance program, with substantial premium flowing into the traditional market each year. Yet the underlying loss picture told a very different story: more than 200 reported claims across a five-year period, with not a single loss reaching $100,000 in incurred value. The exposure was frequent but predictable, well-controlled, and consistently profitable for whichever carrier held the paper. Captives Insure structured a program to return that profit potential to the business itself.
Few exposures test a construction insurance program the way New York does. A worker who is already covered by workers' compensation can, through a chain of contractual and statutory mechanics, end up generating a multi-million-dollar liability claim that lands squarely on the general liability tower — and, in turn, on whoever agreed to indemnify up the contractual chain. That mechanism is commonly called "action over," and in New York it operates against the backdrop of the most plaintiff-favorable construction liability statute in the country. For any captive owner with New York project exposure, or with contracts that reach into New York work, understanding how these two forces combine is essential before deciding what to retain and what to cede
The market heading into the second half of 2026 is defined by a paradox: more capital than ever, deployed with unusual restraint. Property catastrophe reinsurance is softening into a clear buyer's market, the primary commercial market is diverging sharply line by line, and casualty — umbrella in particular — is tightening even as the rest of the book gives back rate. The two halves of that picture point in opposite directions, and the appropriate posture into 1/1 reflects both
Every business carries risk, but not all risk is equal; and not all of it can be handed to the standard commercial market. Some exposures are covered cleanly by conventional property, liability, and workers' compensation policies. Others are priced punitively, covered only narrowly, or effectively uninsurable in the traditional market altogether. The first purpose of an enterprise risk assessment is to understand an organization's risk in full: to see plainly what threatens the business and, just as importantly, which of those threats the standard market does not adequately address
Capital is what separates a captive that looks like an insurer from one that functions as one. When a captive applies for a license, the regulator's central question is not whether the structure is clever or the tax treatment favorable, it is whether the company holds enough capital and surplus to pay the claims it promises to pay, under adverse conditions as well as expected ones. Capitalization is therefore not a one-time formality of formation. It is the ongoing measure of whether a captive can actually bear the risk it has taken on
Captives Insure will be attending the North Carolina Captive Insurance Association (NCCIA) Annual Conference — one of the premier domicile events in the captive insurance industry. Each year the conference brings together captive owners, domicile regulators, fronting carriers, reinsurers, actuaries, and advisors for programming on program design, regulatory developments, and the direction of the broader P&C market.
SUBMIT A RISK