Transitioning from a segregated cell facility to a pure (single parent) captive insurance company can be accomplished efficiently by leveraging the process of transferring assets and liabilities. With evolving regulations in many captive domiciles, this pathway is becoming both common and streamlined, giving organizations clear advantages in control and structure. While a cell captive offers many of the same benefits of pure captives and a lower barrier to entry from both a premium and cost perspective, there can be motivations to move to a single parent / “pure” captive. This article will explore some of the differences and considerations to make between these captive structures.
A Missouri-based assisted and skilled nursing facility engaged Captives Insure to reimagine its liability insurance program. Intent on retaining greater control over claims and underwriting profit, the organization requested a captive insurance structure able to both fulfill strict regulatory/lender requirements and maximize risk retention.
The government is now reopening after the longest shutdown in U.S. history, restoring vital functions for federal insurance programs and prompting the insurance industry to restart delayed operations. However, significant debate and lingering uncertainties remain, particularly regarding future health insurance subsidies and long-term impacts.
Captives are increasingly diversifying their reinsurance structures to manage complex and evolving risk portfolios. While treaty reinsurance remains foundational for predictable exposures, facultative and layered reinsurance programs are being used to address tightening capacity and distressed lines, such as auto and general liability. By blending quota share, excess of loss, and facultative placements, captives can tailor coverage and optimize retention levels, often using reinsurance primarily for catastrophic protection. The use of advanced analytics, proprietary loss data, and transparent risk reporting has become a key advantage, enabling captives to negotiate more favorable terms and access capacity in markets where traditional reinsurance remains constrained.
The current commercial insurance market has undergone significant transformation in recent years, marked by dramatic swings between hard and soft market cycles. As a consultant working alongside global brokers, captive managers, and high-performing businesses, it’s crucial to understand both the dynamics of today’s insurance landscape and the compelling advantages that captive insurance offers.
Captive insurance structures vary widely in economic performance. While deductible reimbursement policies remain familiar to many insureds, they represent a legacy approach with inherent limitations—restricted premium flow, carrier appetite constraints, contractual friction, and tax complications. In contrast, captive reinsurance structures deliver superior premium allocation, enhanced market access, operational efficiency, and measurable performance advantages. For sophisticated risk managers, the reinsurance model represents the optimal path to maximize captive value and long-term control.
An overview of the projected path and damage of th Hurricane Melissa (now one of the strongest storms ever recorded in the Caribbean), as well as implications to the larger insurance/reinsurance marketplace, and the role that captive insurance strategies often play in helping to insulate, manage, and mitigate the impact of international catastrophe events.
SUBMIT A RISK